Comments on: Improved Verizon 3G Wireless Coverage in Woodland Hills http://www.losanjealous.com/2010/01/04/improved-verizon-3g-wireless-coverage-in-woodland-hills/ Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:05:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Ryan http://www.losanjealous.com/2010/01/04/improved-verizon-3g-wireless-coverage-in-woodland-hills/comment-page-1/#comment-247698 Ryan Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:42:50 +0000 http://www.losanjealous.com/?p=29334#comment-247698 Come on V, you've been talking about moving WHCC adjacent for years now. Just stick with Verizon. The increase in network coverage and capacity means more calls, emails, text and picture messages for locals, plus expanded wireless access to the web. Come on V, you’ve been talking about moving WHCC adjacent for years now. Just stick with Verizon. The increase in network coverage and capacity means more calls, emails, text and picture messages for locals, plus expanded wireless access to the web.

]]> By: Victor http://www.losanjealous.com/2010/01/04/improved-verizon-3g-wireless-coverage-in-woodland-hills/comment-page-1/#comment-247697 Victor Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:40:09 +0000 http://www.losanjealous.com/?p=29334#comment-247697 Thanks, Thome. I've heard that testament to Verizon before. But then Gizmodo's test on LA 3G shook things up a bit - even AT&T winning some locations - http://gizmodo.com/5431459//gallery/6 So we're thoroughly confused. Thanks, Thome. I’ve heard that testament to Verizon before.

But then Gizmodo’s test on LA 3G shook things up a bit – even AT&T winning some locations -

http://gizmodo.com/5431459//gallery/6

So we’re thoroughly confused.

]]> By: thome http://www.losanjealous.com/2010/01/04/improved-verizon-3g-wireless-coverage-in-woodland-hills/comment-page-1/#comment-247696 thome Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:33:01 +0000 http://www.losanjealous.com/?p=29334#comment-247696 If you are really concerned about 3G you have to go with Verizon. It isn't even a debate. If you are really concerned about 3G you have to go with Verizon. It isn’t even a debate.

]]>